By Chris Kwiecinski
Sales in Illinois gun stores have risen in the past month, as gun owners fear their firearms will be confiscated or gun costs will rise due to potential legislative changes, gun-store owners said this week.
The potential new laws stem from reaction to the Parkland shooting last month.
According to Todd Vandermyde, executive director of Federal Firearms Licensees of Illinois, the first mention of stricter gun laws sets off a chain reaction that always seems to lead to panic among gun owners.
“Any time the government moves to restrict firearms in a very brash or broad way, usually it sets off a small panic buying,” Vandermyde said. “It generally spurs gun owners to stock up and make the purchases they were contemplating and had been putting off.”
By Nathan Rizzo
Following the Parkland shooting, the opening lines to this latest act in a tired, nationwide drama are being written: Gun control is, once again, in play.
A new cast, however, may be waiting in the wings.
In Illinois, lawmakers on Wednesday will vote on whether to bar individuals under 21 from acquiring certain firearms and high-capacity magazines, and to impose a 72-hour waiting period for gun purchases.Gov. Bruce Rauner vetoed a bill one day earlier that would have newly applied licensure requirements to gun dealers.
Rauner said the “duplicative” measure would have proved financially burdensome for firearms retailers while doing “little to improve public safety.”
Yet, advocacy in support of legislative efforts to both regulate and deregulate firearms has taken on a newfound poignancy in the wake of the Valentine’s Day killing of 17 students and staff at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. Prominent groups on both sides witnessed a surge in interest following the shooting, they say, with significant input from volunteers – some of whom were previously on the sidelines.
“It’s because we’re all from here,” said Eileen Soderstrom, 71, a retired IT specialist and board member of People for a Safer Society, a Chicago-based gun-control group.
“We’re motivated by gun violence in Chicago. People are concerned that young people in society are in
By Kaitlin Englund
As the one-month anniversary of the Parkland school shooting nears, and lawmakers debate provisions for gun safety and reform, Chicago-area educators say that arming teachers is not a viable solution and challenge the nation’s leaders to find alternative solutions.
“I think it’s so beyond ridiculous,” said Matt Walsh, a history and psychology teacher at Evanston Township High School. “The solution to guns is not guns.”
Walsh is not alone in his sentiment as other teachers have called the idea “wild,” and worse, and declare they are completely against arming teachers in schools.
By Serena Yeh
More than 30 years ago, Satnaam Singh Mago’s grandfather was murdered by gun in the United Kingdom.
“For my mom, it took her about maybe 20, 25 years after her father’s death where she could actually talk about some of the dark things that happened to him,” Mago, a youth mentor at the Sikh Religious Society, said. “It was very hard. It affected my family tremendously.”
Mago, 33, a second-generation American in the United States, now actively participates as a speaker and panelist against gun violence and advocates for commonsense gun laws and for people to take an academic approach toward gun culture.
On Feb. 21, a week after the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting, Mago joined an interfaith panel against gun violence at the Libertyville Civic Center in the northern suburbs.
The Florida shooting also sparked activism from the surviving students, who are rallying through news appearances, town hall meetings and social media to call for tighter gun control. This has caused a push back from the National Rifle Association, which continues to argue that Second Amendment rights be protected.
Amid this debate and with the recent series of mass shootings, immigrants to the United States are left wondering about the country they have moved to – a country they believed would provide a better life. Some have chosen to speak out, others have opted to be more cautious about the places they visit, rejecting crowded events like concerts, while some others have considered buying guns to protect themselves.
By Giulia Petroni
The shootings at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, demonstrate that the emotional impact of a tragedy leads people to question the existing security measures and demand for some reinforcements. The expanded use of metal detectors, lock-down policies and surveillance cameras, however, also challenge people’s freedom.
Are individuals willing to trade liberty for security? How much freedom are they willing to sacrifice? Do restrictive measures really make people feel safer?
Amy Zajakowski Uhll, director at the Chicago Center for Integration and Healing’s Groups, a center providing integrated psychotherapy on a wide range of mental-health issues, with a specialty in the treatment of anxiety and trauma, discussed a psychological perspectives with Medill Reports. Here is the conversation:
By Ilana Marcus
In the weeks following the Parkland, Florida school shooting, Chicago-based psychologist Nancy Molitor noticed that the tragedy was surfacing repeatedly during sessions with her patients, even though it happened more than a thousand miles away.
“They were coming in for other issues, but it was the first thing on their mind,” said Molitor, who specializes in mood and anxiety disorders.
“This shooting in particular, I think impacted the public as a whole, even if they haven’t been witnesses,” she said.
School social worker Katie Prahin also noticed an increase in anxiety among the students at her Catholic school in Chicago.
“It doesn’t necessarily manifest itself where you see children talking directly about school shootings or gun violence,” she said. “I think that’s due to what they’re hearing about, whether it’s their exposure to the news, whether they hear their parents talking about it, whether they hear their peers talking about it.”